In light of the current Gosnell trial , the question again arises as to the rights of a baby who survives an abortion. Should the baby receive intensive care, should it be set aside so it can expire, or should it's life be terminated by the abortionist? Gosnell faces charges for allegedly choosing the latter action. However, the law currently demands protection of all children born in the United States, including those slipping through the abortionist's hands. Can we abortion clinics, often guilty of gendercide , to do better than Gosnell in upholding the law? According to one investigative reporter, no. On her site (caution: graphic content), Live Action founder Lila Rose explains that " Gosnell is not alone. [These videos] document the blatantly inhuman and barbaric acts of abortionists leaving crying babies to die, or even killing the newborns themselves ." Indeed, which makes sense. Regardless of the law, those seeking an abortion are seeking to erase